Mala vs Letta
Sealing the State of Stateful Agents
The Core Difference
Letta treats agents as stateful services (like an OS). Mala treats agent states as legal liabilities. Letta manages the 'state' (RAM); Mala seals the 'snapshot' (Disk/Audit).
Feature Comparison4 features
Feature
Mala
Letta
Metaphor
✓The Notary
The Operating System
Persistence
✓Cryptographic Chain
Memory Blocks
Control
✓External Policy
Internal Memory Management
Focus
✓Defensibility
Continuity
Why Enterprise Teams Choose Mala
Letta's 'LLM as OS' concept is brilliant for creating persistent agents. But in the enterprise, persistence = risk. Mala acts as the filesystem authority for Letta agents. Every time a Letta agent takes an action or updates its core memory, Mala generates a proof. This allows you to run stateful agents with stateless accountability.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Mala an OS for agents?
No. Letta is the OS. Mala is the 'Compliance Department' that lives in the kernel. We monitor the OS to ensure it follows the law.
The decision is clear
Start Sealing Your Decisions
Don't just monitor what happened. Prove why it happened with Mala's cryptographic accountability layer.